Summarize William Paley's argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Summarize William Paleys argument - Essay ExampleHe illustrates this through an interrogation of a grab. While taking a leisurely walk and one finds a match and a watch on the ground, an examiner whitethorn be curious about those objects. He may think that the stone had been there forever because it was natures design, but the watch may have been there out-of-pocket to human intervention. This may get him to focus on the watch, which is a far more valuable intimacy than the insignificant stone. The watch, so c atomic number 18fully designed, had been created with a specific purpose, and being found on the ground may seem to be an unlikely circumstance since it does not belong there. Paley so meticulously describes each ramify of the watch to show that its interconnection with the other pops was intended, so that the whole system could work. Had one part stop working, then the whole thing would be worthless. In examining the watch, so many questions may have it off to mind, m uch(prenominal) as why it was created, who was fundament the creation and for whom and for what purpose it was created other than the obvious reason of notification time. Paley first argues that so much more can come out of ones examination of the watch that it brings about more appreciation to the examiner. He may marvel at the genius behind its creation, taking notice that the creator is one of a kind to have crafted such a machine. He may even be humbled to know that he himself is unable to come up with a fraction of the idea of a watch The existence whoever or whatever created that watch whether he is heretofore living or have died in the distant past now becomes more concrete to Paley. On his second argument, he admits to the f each(prenominal)ibility of the watch, that even with the best intentions of the creator to make it work efficiently at all times, it may still be vulnerable to defects. However, it does not lessen the examiners appreciation of such a gadget. He also ar gued that because of the intricate design of the watch there may be move that could be missed in the examination, or parts that may still be in carry of clarification as to its role in making the watch work. Not knowing about these lucubrate does not invalidate the examiners belief that all parts, including the unknown ones, work together harmoniously in contributing to the efficiency of the watch. Another argument Paley made was that the existence of the watch in the inject found must have followed an order that caused it to land where it is which the watchmaker may not even be aware of. All the thinking that the examination of the watch entails can make the examiner wonder if it was situated there on purpose for him to think deeply, but Paley argues that it would be realized that there was no contrivance on that matter, but the curious nature of the watchs existence in the particular mail service was inherently bound to make one think deeply about it. Paley goes on to expla in the gold-bearing nature of the watch. No matter how overwhelming the watch and its inner workings is, its existence should just be accepted as a usual occurrence. Confident as the examiner may be with his familiarity of the world, examination of the watch may make him conclude that he does not and cannot know everything. Paley concludes that there are things in this world that the examiner will never know nor understand no matter how solid he tries, and he